Antivirus Performance Comparison

They can do anything from the theft of your hard disk space to accessing your personal information and draining your CPU. There are numerous anti-virus programs on the market to protect your gadgets from these problems. The most important thing to do is select one that will have a minimal impact on the performance of your system. This is the primary factor that all of our antivirus programs are tested against. The results below are dependent on the amount of time it takes each program to perform an operation. Kaspersky Security Cloud Free, for instance, had a background effect of 6% when running a full scan, while ESET had an impact of 12 percent.

Avira is a German company has a great reputation in our tests. It consistently scores above 90 percent in the three categories of Protection (False positives) and Performance (False Positives) and Usability. The interface is user friendly and provides a wide range of functions, including a clever firewall as well as a variety of privacy tools. Avira subscriptions are billed monthly instead of a fixed 3 to 5 years. This makes it simpler to cancel the subscription or make changes at anytime.

A relatively new hack the system of any company name that we have tested, Essentware – which was previously known as PCKeeper – uses the Avira engine behind the scenes and generally scores quite well across the all the tests. Its performance and interface are both simple to use, but there are a few issues with stability that resulted in scanning jobs freezing that have led to a lower rating. The detection was satisfactory and a flawless run of the certification sets was rewarded with VB100.

Plinius